Thursday, June 22, 2017

Meet The Real Amazon Drones

An employee loads a truck with boxes to be shipped at the, Inc. distribution center in Phoenix, Ariz., on Nov. 26, 2012. (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
At least five days a week, Myron Ballard races around Washington, D.C., with a cargo van full of Amazon Prime packages. A career delivery driver with 20 years behind the wheel, Ballard typically gets paid $1.50 for each address he visits. If he delivers 150 Amazon boxes — a fairly routine number — he can pull in $225. Not bad for a day’s work.

That is, until he starts tallying up all his out-of-pocket costs. Ballard works for an Amazon contractor called LaserShip. He’s technically an “independent contractor,” not an employee, meaning all of the costs stemming from the deliveries fall on him rather than on LaserShip or Amazon. 

Ballard had to purchase the cargo van he drives for work. He doesn’t get reimbursed for the wear and tear he puts on it; for the gasoline he pours into it on a near-daily basis; for the auto insurance he needs to carry; or for the parking tickets he inevitably racks up downtown. He doesn’t even get reimbursed for the LaserShip uniform he’s obliged to purchase and wear.

At the end of the day, much of that $225 has vanished.

“It’s like they want us to be employees, but they don’t want to pay for it,” said Ballard, 45.

Anyone who shops regularly online, particularly with Amazon, has to marvel at how quickly and cheaply packages arrive on the doorstep these days. Many of the millions of Amazon Prime members — including this reporter — may have noticed, however, that not all packages are ferried by workers wearing the familiar UPS, FedEx or U.S. Postal Service uniforms. Instead, they’re sometimes handled by smaller companies like LaserShip, with drivers working on contract and out of their own vehicles.
Delivery drivers are the real Amazon drones — workers who hustle to feed our growing demand for next-day or same-day delivery from online retailers. And as the e-commerce industry continues to grow, the drivers classified as independent contractors are the ones feeling the squeeze.

These particular drivers work under a system that shifts the costs associated with employment away from the company and onto the worker. In this arrangement, a busted transmission can be the difference between putting food on the table and being out of a job. That’s partly why the service is so cheap for retailers, and, ultimately, for customers as well. 

For starters, a delivery company using independent contractors avoids paying payroll or unemployment taxes on its drivers, as well as workers’ compensation insurance — nevermind basic workplace benefits like health coverage and a 401(k). Such companies also aren’t obliged to pay workers overtime under federal law, meaning no time and a half when the delivery day stretches into a 12-hour shift. And since they pay drivers on a per-delivery basis, they don’t owe them anything for non-delivery work, like loading the van at the warehouse before hitting the road, a task that can take up to two hours.
The arrangement also makes it virtually impossible for the drivers to unionize since they’re non-employees.

“The biggest savings for the employers, and the reason they’re so devoted to the business plan, is the workers’ comp and the tax stuff. It’s really lucrative,” said Catherine Ruckelshaus, a lawyer with the National Employment Law Project, a worker advocacy group. “The work is all dictated by the employer, and they’re not investing anything in [the driver’s] business.”

The arrangement appears essential to the bottom line of LaserShip, a once-small “last mile” courier company founded in 1986 and based in Vienna, Va., that’s grown right along with the e-commerce boom. Although as a privately held company LaserShip doesn’t disclose its size or revenue, it now handles deliveries for Amazon and others in areas stretching from New England down to Florida. Without the elaborate and costly distribution network of, say, UPS, a courier company like LaserShip is well-positioned to perform fast, cheap deliveries in dense areas like Washington.

Just last month, the company said it had expanded its service area by 44 percent, adding New Hampshire, Rhode Island, West Virginia and Delaware to the list of states where it delivers. “We are widening the net for e-commerce shippers to reach more consumers, in less time, at competitive ground rates — everybody wins,” an executive said in a March press release

Plenty of LaserShip drivers don’t count themselves among the winners. Despite the brisk business through Amazon, The Huffington Post interviewed a half-dozen drivers who said they were recently asked to accept a new contract reducing their pay. The proposal amounted to a 10 percent pay cut, the drivers said.

Earlier this month, a judge approved a class-action settlement that requires LaserShip to pay $800,000 after drivers in Massachusetts accused the company of wrongfully misclassifying them as independent contractors in order to save money. The workers maintained that they were in fact employees and therefore eligible for minimum wage and overtime protections. A LaserShip spokesman declined an interview request for this story; the company also declined to respond to a list of emailed questions on its pay practices. 

According to court records, work contracts and driver pay stubs reviewed by HuffPost, LaserShip appears to make money off of more than just drivers’ labor. The company extracts a variety of fees that can drive down a worker’s earnings significantly. 

Some of these deductions are on the smaller side, like a $6 weekly “administrative” fee, ostensibly to cover the cost of paperwork and the pay stub itself. Others are more considerable, like a $23 weekly “insurance” fee, separate from the driver’s own auto insurance. The “radio” rental, covering the hand-held computer drivers use to scan boxes they deliver, costs another $22.50 per week. Numerous drivers told HuffPost they have no choice but to lease it from the company. 

That means that over the course of a year, a driver could pay as much as $1,170 for the privilege of renting a piece of equipment that the company requires him or her to use.

But those expenses pale when compared to what drivers pour into their vehicles. Drivers typically spend thousands of dollars a year on gasoline. They can write off the cost on their taxes, but they can’t get reimbursement for it. Stephen Ellis, who drove for the company for less than a year and quit in 2010, remembers filling up his sedan at the gas station almost every day and putting tens of thousands of miles on it in a matter of months.

“That’s really why I got out,” said Ellis. “The bills on the car, to give it regular maintenance, it was $800 every three months or so. … It was crazy.”

A driver like Ballard can gross $60,000 a year if he’s willing to work 80-hour weeks, but expenses will drive that haul down closer to $40,000. Then he takes a big tax hit come springtime, having had no withholdings throughout the year. He also gets no health coverage or paid time off through the job, and his pay fluctuates from week to week. 

Despite his two decades in the field, Ballard said he now earns significantly less than he used to in a previous job with UPS. According to the job survey site, hourly UPS drivers earn an average of about $55,000 per year, and salaried drivers make $70,000 with benefits.

One current LaserShip driver, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of losing his contract with the company, said that when his vehicle recently broke down while delivering Amazon packages, he invested in a used van to make sure he kept his route. In addition to leveraging $7,000 of his own savings and credit, he took out a loan facilitated by LaserShip. The principal plus interest were deducted directly from his paychecks, which were reviewed by HuffPost.

After taking on debt in order to keep his job, the man was asked to accept a lower per-delivery pay, he said. 

“That’s part of their pitch: ‘You’re investing in your company,’” the driver said. “I thought I was investing. But now I’m facing a pay cut.”

In the future, Amazon packages may be delivered by unmanned aircraft, but for now there’s a different kind of Amazon drone at work getting goods to your doorstep. (AP Photo/Amazon)
The use of independent contractors isn’t new to the delivery business. FedEx is often credited with perfecting the scheme. The practice has helped make the company’s ground shipping subsidiary a giant in the industry, though it’s also led to lawsuits filed by workers who, like the LaserShip drivers in Massachusetts, believe they are actually employees owed labor protections under the law. 

Ivan Hofmann, an industry consultant with ETC & Associates, is a former FedEx Ground executive who helped develop the company’s independent contractor system. Hofmann said he remains a “firm believer” in the model. 

“It’s the American way,” Hofmann said. “When paid by the hour, the motivation is the hour. We paid by the stop and the piece and the weight. The faster you worked, the more money you made. Your income wasn’t fixed. You could make a lot of money if you were smart and you hustled.”

The problem, Hofmann added, is that the incentive structures at some delivery companies aren’t enough. “It can be fair or not,” he said. 

Mike Johnson has delivered packages since 1996, doing stints with UPS, FedEx and now LaserShip. He said the pay structure for an independent contractor under FedEx came with certain sweeteners that are absent at LaserShip. They included bonuses for being accident-free and for carrying the FedEx brand on his vehicle.

“When you have three FedEx routes, you’ve got money set aside for when your truck breaks down,” Johnson said.

Perry Colosimo, a FedEx spokesman, wrote in an email that FedEx Ground has always done its business through independent contractors. As online retail has grown, a lot of FedEx contractors have hired more drivers, he said.

“We offer competitive financial terms, which are enhanced by the world-renowned FedEx brand and our strong position in today’s growing e-commerce market,” Colosimo said.

The typical LaserShip contract offers drivers no guarantee on their routes or the number of packages they’ll carry. It also stipulates that either LaserShip or the driver can end the contract with just 15 days’ notice. If a driver refuses to accept lower pay, the company in theory can terminate the arrangement.

“There’s no job security,” Johnson said.

At this point, a lot of businesses have become wholly dependent on the independent contractor scheme as a way to keep costs down. This is particularly true of the trucking and courier industries, which lawyers are now targeting with lawsuits alleging worker misclassification. Other little-known shipping companies used by Amazon — such as OnTrac and Prestige — have sought independent contractors for work.

A trade group has even sprouted up to beat back state and federal efforts to rein in abuse under the model. The group is called It’s My Business, implying that it represents the interests of independent contractors, rather than the companies that use them. The group says on its website that legislative threats to the model could “force thousands of people to close their businesses and fire employees.” 

It’s My Business is chaired by former Democratic Sen. Blanche Lincoln (Ark.), whose name is attached to various op-eds calling independent contractors the “quiet engine” of whatever state the op-ed is running in (including one on HuffPost). Among the group’s listed members are the Customized Logistics and Delivery Association, a trade lobby that’s had a LaserShip executive on its board, as well as FedEx Ground.

Some delivery companies may feel they have little choice but to employ the scheme, particularly if they’re trying to cut costs enough to win or maintain contracts with the likes of Amazon. If they can’t do the work at a price Amazon finds acceptable, surely the world’s largest online retailer could find someone who will.

That’s what a LaserShip co-founder, Farhang Aryan, suggested in a deposition related to the Massachusetts lawsuit. Aryan said an increase of 5 percent in what the company asks of its customers like Amazon could get it “terminated” from its contracts. 

“I know of situations [where] a customer says, ‘If you do not increase the rates, I will give you [an] additional year of contract, and if you want to do any increases, this has to go to a bidding process,’” he said.

William Deschenes, a former Lasership manager, noted in his deposition that Amazon is now LaserShip’s largest customer by any measure. According to Deschenes’ testimony, Amazon expects that 98.5 percent of its deliveries arrive on time, and LaserShip drivers are measured under a rubric known as “deficiencies per million opportunities,” or DPMOs, i.e., failed deliveries. Drivers told HuffPost that LaserShip management informed them they could lose their work through Amazon if the drivers can’t keep their DPMO levels down. 

It isn’t clear how large or small a piece of Amazon’s delivery operation LaserShip handles, or how much the retailer relies upon companies using contractors and their personal vehicles. Amazon didn’t respond to interview requests.

One of the plaintiffs in the Massachusetts lawsuit, Milton Sanchez, testified that LaserShip management suddenly cut his pay. He alleged that it was customary for drivers to be pressured “under duress” to sign new contracts lowering their own rate. 

“At the beginning we were making a decent pay,” Sanchez testified. “And then they started cutting, cutting. … They couldn’t make money with the client, so they make money with us. That’s the way I see it.” Asked about the various costs that drivers are forced to swallow, Sanchez said, “You break it down, and I’ll start crying.”

The driver whose vehicle broke down is among the LaserShip contractors who said they were asked to sign new contracts dropping their pay. He has so far refused.

He said he now regrets putting his savings and a high-interest loan toward a cargo van he will in all likelihood run into the ground. Lately, he’s been working 12-hour days, six days a week, sometimes delivering more than 200 Amazon packages in a day’s work. He frets over his van breaking down again — and his contract coming to an end. 

“I know they’ve given us a job, and we have to respect that,” the driver said. “But when you work hard, they should pay you more — not take more away.”

Packages ready to ship move along a conveyor belt at the 1.2 million square foot fulfillment center Monday, Nov. 26, 2012, in Phoenix. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)
Now, this article is old - almost 3 years old.  But 2 years later  The Ride Share Guy has this to say about contract package driving. And here  is Amazon's pitch for delivering their packages

You're Not Forgetful, You're Just Efficient

Forgetting Can Make You Smarter

Credit: CC0 Public Domain Jun 21, 2017

For most people having a good memory means being able to remember more information clearly for long periods of time. For neuroscientists too, the inability to remember was long believed to represent a failure of the brain's mechanisms for storing and retrieving information. 

But according to a new review paper from Paul Frankland, a senior fellow in CIFAR's Child & Brain Development program, and Blake Richards, an associate fellow in the Learning in Machines & Brains program, our brains are actively working to forget. In fact, the two University of Toronto researchers propose that the goal of memory is not to transmit the most accurate information over time, but to guide and optimize intelligent decision making by only holding on to valuable information.

"It's important that the brain forgets irrelevant details and instead focuses on the stuff that's going to help make decisions in the real world," says Richards.

The review paper, published this week in the journal Neuron, looks at the literature on remembering, known as persistence, and the newer body of research on forgetting, or transience. The recent increase in research into the brain mechanisms that promote forgetting is revealing that forgetting is just as important a component of our memory system as remembering.

"We find plenty of evidence from recent research that there are mechanisms that promote memory loss, and that these are distinct from those involved in storing information," says Frankland.

One of these mechanisms is the weakening or elimination of synaptic connections between neurons in which memories are encoded. Another mechanism, supported by evidence from Frankland's own lab, is the generation of new neurons from stem cells. As new neurons integrate into the hippocampus, the new connections remodel hippocampal circuits and overwrite memories stored in those circuits, making them harder to access. This may explain why children, whose hippocampi are producing more new neurons, forget so much information.

It may seem counterintuitive that the brain would expend so much energy creating new neurons at the detriment of memory. Richards, whose research applies artificial intelligence (AI) theories to understanding the brain, looked to principles of learning from AI for answers. Using these principles, Frankland and Richards frame an argument that the interaction between remembering and forgetting in the human brain allows us to make more intelligent memory-based decisions.

It does so in two ways. First, forgetting allows us to adapt to new situations by letting go of outdated and potentially misleading information that can no longer help us maneuver changing environments.

"If you're trying to navigate the world and your brain is constantly bringing up multiple conflicting memories, that makes it harder for you to make an informed decision," says Richards.

The second way forgetting facilitates decision making is by allowing us to generalize past events to new ones. In artificial intelligence this principle is called regularization and it works by creating simple computer models that prioritize core information but eliminate specific details, allowing for wider application.

Memories in the brain work in a similar way. When we only remember the gist of an encounter as opposed to every detail, this controlled forgetting of insignificant details creates simple memories which are more effective at predicting new experiences.

Ultimately, these mechanisms are cued by the environment we are in. A constantly changing environment may require that we remember less. For example, a cashier who meets many new people every day will only remember the names of her customers for a short period of time, whereas a designer that meets with her clients regularly will retain that information longer.

"One of the things that distinguishes an environment where you're going to want to remember stuff versus an environment where you want to forget stuff is this question of how consistent the environment is and how likely things are to come back into your life, " says Richards.

Similarly, research shows that episodic memories of things that happen to us are forgotten more quickly than general knowledge that we access on a daily basis, supporting the old adage that if you don't use it, you lose it. But in the context of making better memory-based decisions, you may be better off for it.

Read more at:

Worth Looking Into

Redneck Revolt Builds Anti-Racist, Anti-Capitalist Movement With Working Class Whites

Baffling Airport Noise with Landscape

How Amsterdam’s Airport Is Fighting Noise Pollution With Land Art

Amusing Planet 
Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport, located just 9 km southwest of the city, is the third busiest airport in Europe and one of the busiest in the world. In an average year, more than 63 million passengers pass through Schiphol in as many as 479,000 flights to and from various international destinations. That’s an average of about 1,300 flights every day, or nearly a flight every minute. In other words, Schiphol is very busy and very loud.

When the Dutch military first built a landing strip here in 1916, they chose the site because it was a polder —a broad and flat lowland that used to be the bed of a vast lake. Over the decades the flat expanse of the Haarlemmermeer polder became one of the most densely populated areas of the country, and the noise produced by the airport became an annoying problem for the residents. 

For years, residents complained about the incessant rumbling din produced every time an aircraft took off. This type of noise, called ground-level noise, propagates across the flat and featureless Haarlemmermeer landscape that has nothing in between—no hills, no valleys— to disrupt the path of the sound waves. When the airport opened its longest runway in 2003, residents could hear the din more than 28 km away.

To tackle the noise problem, the airport brought in an unlikely candidate—an architecture firm called H+N+S Landscape Architects and artist Paul De Kort.

The idea to engage a landscape artist to solve a technical problem was born out of an accident. In 2008, after a failed attempt to control noise, the Schiphol Airport officials discovered that after the arable land between the runway and the surrounding settlements were ploughed, the noise dropped.

So Paul De Kort dug a series of hedges and ditches on the southwest of the airport, just past the edge of the runway. The distance between the ridges are roughly equivalent to the wavelength of the airport noise, which is about 36 feet. There are 150 perfectly straight and symmetrical furrows with six foot high ridges between them. These simple ridges have reduced noise levels by more than half.

Paul De Kort drew on the experiences of an 18th century German physicist and musician named Ernst Chladni, whose research into the physics of sound laid the groundwork for modern acoustic science. He is sometimes referred to as ‘the father of acoustics’. In one of his most famous experiments, Chladni sprinkled salt or sand across a metal plate and subjected it to vibration causing the grains to arrange themselves into geometric patterns and ridges. Today, we call them Chladni figures.

Paul De Kort’s landscaping work around Amsterdam Airport Schiphol eventually became a 36-hectare park called Buitenschot. Various paths run through the park area. There’s a paved bicycle lane in the center and a paved footpath crosses the park. The most informal network is created by the grassy and cut paths between the ridges. De Kort also incorporated a number of art pieces within the park, such as the “Listening Ear,” a parabolic dish that amplifies sound coming from far away, and “Chaldnipond”, a diamond-shaped pond with a bridge and a mechanism underneath it which can create waves in the water. 

The airport is trying to cut down noise even further by changing when certain planes can take off and requiring airlines to update their fleets. The plan is to achieve a noise reduction of up to 10 decibels.

All photographs courtesy Paul De Kort and H+N+S Landscape Architects.

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Rosie the Riveter 'Band-aids'

from: Archie McPhee's Endless Geyser of Awesome

We can heal it

Rosie the Riveter was so tough and determined that she could work through just about anything. Still, she got hurt sometimes. These Rosie the Riveter Bandages let people know that you got hurt doing something important and persisted through the owie to achieve greatness. A great reminder that it’s your setbacks that make you stronger in the long run. You get fifteen 3” x 1” sterile strips in a 3-3/4” tall metal tin. FREE PRIZE!
Get yours today!  Get 'em HERE!  Only 6 bucks and they come in a cool tin!

23 Minutes of Selfless Acts

Real Life Heroes Compilation 11 min. 19 sec.

Real Life Heroes Compilation (Animal Rescue)14 min. 19 sec.

In these times of selfish, vicious and just plain crazy politicians, febrile terrorists, hysterical media, and confused and frightened masses of people, it's nice to know that people can care, and risk, and make a difference.  Try to remember that for all the hateful, stupid and greedy people out there, there are at least two ordinary souls who can be decent, and selfless, and make the world a better place.